Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
hillary clinton and former cia director david petraeus, to cross-reference their testimony about the night of the attacks and how the state department and the cia were working together in benghazi. the question today is what was this week's tipping point to call for a select committee, and the speaker's statement hinted very strongly that it was these new documents as ed mentioned, that lead directly into the white house, quote, the administration's withholding of documents, e-mails showing greater white house involvement, in the misleading of the american people, is a fragrant violation of trust and undermines the principles of overslight upon which our system of government is built. we understand fox's recent reporting on a d.c. firm was of great interest to the speaker's office because it showed that many of the key players in the benghazi scandal are now employed by a firm friendly to mrs. clinton, john. >> so what are we hearing from democrats on this? >> well, we haven't heard a lot from democrats but the house minority speaker seemed to sum it up, she had not been formally advised b
-mail from 2012 from state department official beth jones, where she tells mrs. clinton's closest aides, she is in touch with the libyans and told them sharia was behind the attack, not gadhafi loyalists. this e-mail was entered into the record today at the hearing. >> what are democrats saying? >> this morning house minority leader nancy pelosi seemed to dismiss the testimony. >> diversion, subterfuge. benghazi, benghazi. why aren't we talking about something else? what i know of what i've read in the press about the -- the e-mails were very consistent with what was put out there before. i don't think there's anything new there. >> another democrat at the hearing this morning made clear it was levels opinion more should have been done-not that more could have been done to save the four americans killed in benghazi. >> might be some who, for various ropes would like to distort your testimony and suggest that you're testifying we coulda, shoulda done a lot more because we had capables we didn't utilize. >> that's not my testimony. >> the house speaker issuing a statement within the last hour,
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2